Twitter
Google plus
Facebook
Vimeo
Pinterest

Fluid Edge Themes

Beyond the arc: technologies to cut Scope 1 emissions of EAF steelmakers

Analysis report · Transition Asia · November 2026

“Switching to electric arc furnaces does not solve the whole decarbonisation challenge. Reheating and annealing can account for 65–92% of the process’s Scope 1 emissions.”

Full report Report-PDF Explore the findings

Cleaner steel does not stop at the arc furnace

Automotive and construction buyers are asking steelmakers for supply chain-wide (Scope 3) emission cuts, so future competitiveness depends in part on climate action. Moving to EAF production on scrap steel or lower-carbon iron such as direct reduced iron (DRI) is one of the most viable near-term strategies, but efforts cannot stop there. Decarbonisation also matters in downstream steps such as rolling and heat treatment, which turn molten steel into sheets and long products.

This report outlines the emission profile of today’s EAF steelmaking process, then examines four technologies that can replace fossil fuels in downstream heating: electric heaters, plasma torches, hydrogen burners and RotoDynamic heaters. We compare their commercial readiness, energy performance and capital cost, and set out three steps for EAF operators.

2.32 tCO₂/tcsglobal average for BF-BOF production, per tonne of crude steel
0.70 tCO₂/tcsglobal average for scrap-based EAF production; 1.43 when DRI is the feedstock
65–92%of the process’s Scope 1 emissions come from reheat furnaces combined with annealing

Fuel, not electricity, drives Scope 1 emissions in an EAF mill

Two heating steps stand out on both fuel use and emissions: the reheat furnace and annealing.

Energy consumption and Scope 1 emissions by process

EAFLadle preheatingLadle furnaceContinuous castingReheat furnaceHot rollingAcid picklingCold rollingCleaning / annealingElectricity usekWh per tonne of steel0200400600800250–600011–515–28070–15018–7640–1000–35Fuel usekWh per tonne of steel02004006007–776–1100170–469000203–264Scope 1 emissionstCO₂ per tonne of steel00.040.080.120.160.001–0.0210.001–0.003000.034–0.1250000.041–0.070
Each bar spans the range from the low to the high value, and the ranges merge sub-cases (with and without scrap preheating, with and without hot charging). Processes in bold are fuel-fired. Source: Transition Asia analysis, based on the public sources listed in the report’s end notes.

Key findings

Click a finding to open it.

Scrap-based EAF steel already emits far less than BF-BOF, but cleaner power does not finish the job
Global average emissions are 2.32 tCO₂ per tonne of crude steel (tcs) for BF-BOF production, 1.43 for EAF production using DRI and 0.70 for scrap-based EAF production. Most EAF emissions come from the electricity used during charging, but renewable electricity alone cannot remove the process emissions that carbon borders and reporting boundaries now count.
Reheating and annealing are where the Scope 1 emissions sit
Reheat furnaces alone account for approximately 44–57% of the steelmaking process’s Scope 1 emissions. Combined with annealing, the share rises to 65–92%. The reheat furnace heats semi-finished steel to approximately 1,200°C before hot rolling, and annealing restores ductility through gas burner heat treatment. Targeting these steps gives the largest decarbonisation return.
Gas burners make EAF steel struggle to reach near-zero emissions
Burners remain the industry standard because they deliver high temperatures rapidly and consistently, high turndown ratios allow immediate adjustment to changing process conditions, and decades of operating experience make the technology mature. But the continued use of these fuels means EAF steel will struggle to reach near zero-emission production.

Four ways to replace the burners

Four technologies can replace the fossil-fuel burners in reheating and annealing, but they differ sharply in maturity, power demand and retrofit effort.

Readiness at a glance

Electric heaterPrecision and High Efficiency

Up to 95% thermal efficiency

Fully commercialised
Plasma torchHigh Energy and Compact Power

Plasma jet up to 5,000°C

R&D / pilot
Hydrogen burnerFamiliar Operations, Zero Carbon

100% hydrogen combustion

Fully commercialised / H₂ ready
RotoDynamic HeaterThe Kinetic Innovator

Process gas up to 1,700°C

Commercial-scale pilot planned
Electric heaterPlasma torchH₂ burnerRotoDynamic heater
EAF––CommercialCommercial-scale pilot planned
Ladle preheatingCommercialR&D / pilotCommercialCommercial-scale pilot planned
Reheat furnaceCommercialR&D / pilotCommercialCommercial-scale pilot planned
Cleaning / annealingCommercial–Commercial (H₂-ready)Commercial-scale pilot planned
CommercialR&D / pilotCommercial-scale pilot planned– Not applicable

How they compare

Electric heaterPlasma torchHydrogen burnerRotoDynamic heater
Where it appliesLadle preheating, reheating furnaces, annealingLadle preheating, reheating furnacesEAF, ladle preheating, reheat furnace, annealingEAF, ladle preheating, reheat furnace, annealing
Heat and efficiencyUp to 95% thermal efficiencyPlasma jet up to 5,000°C100% hydrogen combustion, very high flame temperaturesProcess gas up to 1,700°C; roughly 90–95% thermal efficiency
Main challengeSignificant grid and electrical upgrades; elements can degrade under thermal shock or oxidationSystem energy demand about 25% above gas burners; refractory wearShorter flames, flashback and NOx risks that call for redesigned furnaces, nozzles and valvesNo prolonged operating data at full industrial scale
CAPEXUSD 622,000–5,349,000 per MWUp to USD 383 per tonne of liquid steel capacityAbout 40% of overall furnace CAPEX for a retrofitUndisclosed

Electric annealing works at scale. Nordic special steel manufacturer Ovako pioneered the approach in 2014 and has electrified approximately 90% of its heat treatment capacity.

Hydrogen heating is already running. Ovako’s reheating furnace at Hofors and ArcelorMittal’s ladle preheater at Sestao are both powered by green hydrogen.

Three steps for EAF operators

1. Prioritise reheating furnace decarbonisation

Given that reheating furnaces alone account for over 44% of the steelmaking process’s Scope 1 emissions, interventions in this specific process will yield the highest proportional GHG abatement.

2. Champion direct electrification powered by RE

Acknowledging the heavy energy penalties associated with hydrogen electrolysis, direct electrical heating technologies should serve as the primary decarbonisation vector. Electrification must be powered with RE to eradicate subsequent Scope 2 emissions.

3. Investigate mature technologies despite commercial ambiguity

Heating alternatives for every process traditionally reliant on gas burners are technologically mature. Whilst comprehensive economic comparisons are currently hindered by CAPEX ambiguity, EAF operators would benefit from proactively engaging in pilot projects now to validate operational efficiencies and ensure they are positioned to scale as these technologies advance.

Basis: global average emissions and ranges drawn from the public sources listed in the report’s end notes. Energy comparisons use direct heating efficiency, with plasma torch cooling demand adding about 25% to system energy demand. For information only; not investment advice. The report represents the authors’ views and interpretations of publicly available information.

“Direct electrification, powered by renewable energy, should be the primary way to decarbonise heating in EAF steelmaking.”

Full report Report-PDF

Author

Akira Kanno Author Akira Kanno

Research Analyst, Transition Asia